Converting The Subaru EA81 Engine For Aircraft

Converting The Subaru EA81 Engine For Aircraft

A Subaru for a Karatoo

EA81 Karatoo Subaru aircraft engine

After flying his J-6 Karatoo for more than 41 hours powered by a two-stroke Rotax 582 engine, Don Hansen decided he wanted a four-cycle engine with a better power-to-weight ratio – enter the Subaru EA81.

ARTICLE DATE: December 2004

As a machine tool instructor at Eastern Maine Community College in Bangor, Maine, he was comfortable with undertaking an auto engine conversion. He considered a Volkswagen conversion, but felt the 80 hp for 70 pounds of weight wasn’t a good enough tradeoff.

He toyed with the idea of a Corvair engine, but again the all-up weight of the engine was more than he wanted. Instead, he chose a Subaru EA-81.

While on a family vacation, Subaru EA81 answer man Don Bouchard visited Hansen at his home in Corinth, Massachusetts.

The following Q&A exchange explains Hansen’s work on his engine.

subaru ea81 airplane engine

Bouchard — Why did you pick the EA-81 engine?

Hansen — I picked the Subaru EA81 for its weight-to-horsepower ratio. My airframe is fairly light, and I didn’t want my useful load to get too low. I thought the EA-81 would be the best combination of lightweight and dependability for the horsepower rating.

Bouchard — What did you do to keep the center of gravity (CG) in line?

Hansen — I installed a heavier battery aft in the fuselage. And, the battery is useful; I’m not carrying the extra weight for nothing.

Bouchard — What alternator are you using?

Hansen — It’s a 1989 Geo Metro 55-amp alternator. It weighs a little less than seven pounds.

Bouchard — Your bell housing is well constructed. Could you elaborate on what you did?

Hansen — I cut out a section of the Subaru EA81 engine housing on the backside and welded in a piece of 5/8-inch 6061-T6 aluminum to reduce weight.

Bouchard — You’ve also done a beautiful job on the flywheel. It looks like you cut out some sections in the middle to make it lighter.

Hansen — Yes, I got it as light as I could while still keeping the integrity of its strength in place.

aircraft ea81 auto conversion

Bouchard — Is that a regular Subaru ignition system?

Hansen — It’s a Subaru Hitachi distributor. Some people prefer Nippondenso distributors.

This Hitachi had sleeve bearings and its wear was within limits, so I took out all the internal parts, machined a plate, and mounted two 1986 Hyundai Excel ignition modules 180-degrees apart. The Hyundai Relucta ignition will fit right onto the Hitachi distributor shaft.

Bouchard — What carburetor are you using on the Subaru EA81?

Hansen — It’s a Holly 2300, 350 cfm flow. I have a McNeely mixture control that will allow me to go to idle cutoff, which is a great help on hot starts.

If I can pull the throttle back to idle and let the engine burn itself out of fuel instead of turning the ignition off, then when 1 get ready to hot start, I won’t have fuel trying to vaporize and cause vapor lock problems.

ea81 inlet manifold conversion

Bouchard — Will that keep the carburetor bowl empty when you shut down?

Hansen — No, the bowl will not be empty. This system just shuts the mixture off so that no fuel goes through the carburetor into the intake manifold.

Bouchard — I notice you have a valve in the middle of the engine to get air out.

Hansen — Yes, I run that back through to my fill tank. Some people call that a burp tank. With this arrangement, any trapped water and air will move upward to the level of the burp tank and get rid of any air in the system.

Bouchard — Have you had problems with that before?

Hansen — Yes, on the Rotax 582 there was a bleed valve in the top of the head. In my installation, the radiators were higher than the top of the heads.

In level flight attitude, my burp tank was higher than my radiators. When I filled them, I had to lift the tail and get my aircraft in level flight attitude to bleed the air off. This valve solves that problem on this installation.

Bouchard — I see that you’ve done some machining on the engine.

Hansen — Yes, the crank was polished; I used undersized crank bearings (main bearings) to get my clearances down to Subaru specifications.

I have new rod bearings. The cylinders have been bored to .020. I had the cam ground to give me peak torque at about 4,200 rpm. The heads have been planed to .051.

The intake manifold is a custom intake for the Holly 2300 carburetor. The exhaust ports have been opened up from 1-3/8 inch to 1-3/4 inch, and I made some stainless exhaust pipes from a swimming pool ladder, all of which will let the engine breathe better.

In addition, all of the rotating parts have been balanced, including the flywheel, crank, connecting rod and connecting rod ends, and the pistons with the rings and sure clips in place. I’d recommend that to anyone undertaking this engine conversion.

Bouchard — Why did you plane the heads?

Hansen — The reason I planed the heads is because the cam grind I had done removed .051 from the base circle. For the pushrods to be the correct length and work properly, I had to take .051 off the heads to bring the valve train down the same amount that the base circle had been ground.

I guess I’d recommend that anyone converting an EA-81 take a cleanup on the heads to make sure they’re flat, but not take the amount off the heads that I did. That way if the head ever warps on you and you blow a gasket, you could take another cleanup pass on them and not have to replace the heads.

Bouchard — What kind of lifters are you using?

Hansen — I have hydraulic lifters that I purchased from Stratus 2000 when I had them grind the cam.

Bouchard — Do you recommend hydraulic over mechanical?

Hansen — I prefer hydraulic. Once hydraulic lifters are installed and adjusted properly, you don’t have to touch them.

Bouchard — What reduction unit are you using?

Hansen — It’s a G40 Hirth with a 2.03:1 reduction. I chose the G40 over the G50 because that’s the one Hirth installs on its 100-hp engine. At a 2.03:1 reduction, if I turn my engine at 5,000 rpm I’ll get 2,500 rpm on the propeller, which is well within the tip speeds for the 72-inch prop I’m using. I should be in fine shape with this gearbox.

print
Summary
Converting The Subaru EA81 Engine For Aircraft
Article Name
Converting The Subaru EA81 Engine For Aircraft
Description
A very professional auto conversion of the Subaru EA81 engine by one of the many fixed wing pilots happily racking up the hours. Don Bouchard talks with Don Hansen about how he converted an EA81 for his Karatoo.
Author

6 Comments on "Converting The Subaru EA81 Engine For Aircraft"

  1. Yes enjoyed this article, am modifying an ea81 myself, curious about the choice of carburetor, seems very large for a 1.8 liter engine unless you are aiming for
    very high rpm.

    • Hi Carl, yes – there are a variety of conversions being done, each with their own individual set-up. As this engine is using a reduction drive, I’d say it would be running at high RPM’s. While cruise RPM might be around 4,000 – take-off will be up at the 5,000 rpm range. This size carburetor will give the high RPM breathability needed. Although I know smaller units have been used, this set up seems to be a perfect match. We will bring more engine conversion articles soon.

  2. I have a E 81 for my gyro

  3. I would like to know if any re drives are available in gearboxes? Is there anyone supporting the ea-81 for plane use? I am building a 701. rolling_rock_farms@yahoo.com

  4. I have 2 EA 81 engines looking to sell what are they worth? Thank you Ken

    • Hi Ken, I have seen these go from everywhere between $50 and $1200! There are many factors to selling these engines; such as the particular model/year – 4 port heads, EFI, turbocharged etc… The engines are known for getting a fine hair line crack between the valves in the combustion chamber. Amazingly this fault rarely causes a critical failure, none the less – I wouldn’t be flying it. Also you may find someone desperately needing one and willing to pay a bit more, or, that people recognize these are older engines and have moved on to something else thus not willing to pay much. It’s kind of like “how long is a piece of string?”.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*